fbpx

< Back to Thought Leadership

IRS Proposed Regulations: Impact on Donor Advised Funds

By Corey Schunemann, CPA, Manager at Blue & Co.

The IRS issued proposed regulations that could dramatically affect the landscape and operations of Donor Advised Funds (“DAF”). While many organizations hold DAF funds, this change is especially relevant to community foundations. It is important to keep in mind that these are only proposed regulations which are not legally binding, yet they do point to the thought process of the IRS and may foreshadow final regulations in the future.

A DAF is a fund or account that meets three criteria:

  1. Separately identified by reference to contributions of a donor or donors,
  2. Owned and controlled by a “sponsoring organization”, and
  3. The donor (or donor-advisor) has, or reasonably expects to have, advisory privileges with respect to the distribution or investment of amounts held in the fund or account.

While the proposed regulations have many nuances and expanded definitions, one key definition expansion is to the term “donor-advisor.” Under the proposed regulations, a third-party investment manager who advises both the DAF and the personal funds of the donor could be considered a “donor-advisor.”

This expanded definition is significant – if the DAF pays investment management fees to the investment manager, it could be characterized as a taxable distribution subject to excise taxes up to 25 percent of the payment.

The proposed regulations have an important exception: if the investment manager also advises the sponsoring organization as a whole and charges a uniform fee across all DAFs, the investment management fee will not be characterized as a taxable distribution subject to excise taxes.

In addition to the excise taxes, the donor-advisor must return the entire fee to the sponsoring organization.

If the proposed regulations become final, donors and sponsoring organizations may face significant increases in administrative costs that outweigh the benefits of Donor Advised Funds. Investment managers and sponsoring organizations may no longer be willing to manage DAFs. Large Donor Advised Funds and donors may be able to absorb the additional administrative burdens, while those with less funds may be better off finding other means to give and manage their charitable gifts. Ultimately, we can hope that the IRS changes their mindset.

Contact your Blue & Co. Advisor if you have any questions.

Share this article

CMS Changes to Hospital Price Transparency

On November 21, 2025, CMS finalized updates to Hospital Price Transparency regulations in the CY 2026 Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) and Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) Final Rule. These […]

Learn More
Plan governance committee meeting

Benefit Briefs: Plan Governance Committee Meetings

By Debbie Herbert, CPA, Director at Blue & Co. Have your plan auditors ever asked you for plan governance committee meeting minutes or agendas? There’s a good reason for that. […]

Learn More
Outpatient Therapy: Improving Margins and Referral Flow

Outpatient Therapy: Improving Margins and Referral Flow

Hospital outpatient physical and occupational therapy is one of the few levels of care that has not been forced into a capitated environment. For most hospitals, this service is paid […]

Learn More
Share this article
Share this article